Project Case Study · CFD

Riddhi Taranto — Underground Car Park CFD Analysis

A two-basement ventilation study examining airflow, carbon monoxide distribution and fire-driven smoke behaviour in an enclosed car park in Hyderabad.

2 Levels

Basement 1 and Basement 2

6 ACPH

Normal ventilation mode

12 ACPH

Fire ventilation mode

4 MW

Design passenger-car fire

Project at a Glance

Underground car park ventilation assessment

This case study summarises the supplied Riddhi Taranto CFD report for validation of a ductless car park ventilation system against the project CAD drawings and fan specifications.

Location

Riddhi Taranto, Hyderabad, Telangana

Levels Assessed

Basement 1 (B1) and Basement 2 (B2)

Basement Zones

Z1, Z2 and Z3 in each basement

Ventilation Modes

6 ACPH normal operation and 12 ACPH fire mode, as stated in the report

Fire Scenario

4 MW passenger-car fire over a 2 m × 5 m area

Outputs

Airflow, CO concentration, smoke concentration, sight length and temperature

Project Overview

Assessing airflow, carbon monoxide and fire-driven smoke

This case study summarises the supplied CFD report for the underground car park at Riddhi Taranto, Hyderabad. The report assesses a ductless impulse-ventilation system against the project CAD geometry and fan specifications, examining airflow, carbon monoxide (CO), smoke concentration, sight length and temperature for Basement 1 (B1) and Basement 2 (B2).

Project Objectives

The study evaluates air movement during normal parking operation at 6 air changes per hour (ACPH), CO distribution over time, and smoke behaviour during fire-mode operation at 12 ACPH. The report identifies the design aims as maintaining the stated CO exposure criteria and assessing sight length towards the nearest means of escape after the fire is extinguished.

Car Park Geometry and Zones

The report describes two enclosed basement levels. Its introduction lists the CAD-derived zones Z1, Z2 and Z3, with approximate areas of 2,577 m², 2,378 m² and 1,992 m² respectively. Basement 1 is listed with 157 cars and 160 two-wheelers; Basement 2 is listed with 162 cars. The report's later CO calculation table gives an effective area of approximately 6,619 m² and a height of 3 m for each basement.
Basement 1 three-dimensional car park model with three zones
Basement 1 — three-dimensional car park model and zones
Basement 2 three-dimensional car park model with three zones
Basement 2 — three-dimensional car park model and zones

Ventilation System

Ductless impulse ventilation and fan arrangement

The report specifies GJ-AU315E jet impulse fans, with 20 units per basement and a zone distribution of 7, 7 and 6. The fan table lists 1,236 m³/s in the report's half-thrust column and a velocity of 7.5 m/s for normal operation, and 2,472 m³/s and 15 m/s at full thrust for fire operation. Axial fresh-air, parking-exhaust and smoke-exhaust fans are listed by zone with capacities in CFM.

Basement 1 CFD setup showing fresh-air, exhaust and jet fans
Basement 1 — fresh-air, exhaust and impulse-fan layout
Basement 2 CFD setup showing fresh-air, exhaust and jet fans
Basement 2 — fresh-air, exhaust and impulse-fan layout

Normal Operation

Normal operation is modelled at 6 ACPH with fresh-air and normal exhaust fans at full speed and jet fans at low speed.

Fire Operation

Fire operation is modelled at 12 ACPH, with jet fans at high speed and the fire-zone exhaust fans at full speed.

CFD Methodology and Scenarios

Steady-state airflow and transient CO and fire simulations

The report describes a three-dimensional steady-state simulation for airflow and transient simulations for CO and fire. It identifies the K-ε turbulence model and accounts for geometry and obstructions such as parked vehicles, surrounding buildings, lifts, lobbies and staircases.

3D Geometry

The model includes the CAD-based basement geometry and obstructions including vehicles, surrounding buildings, lifts, lobbies and staircases.

Airflow Analysis

A three-dimensional steady-state simulation is used to assess airflow under the defined normal ventilation conditions.

Transient Analysis

Transient simulations examine CO distribution and fire-driven smoke behaviour over time under the specified operating scenarios.

Carbon Monoxide Assessment

Reviewing CO distribution across both basement levels

The report models CO sources across the basement to represent vehicle emissions under a stated worst-case scenario. It uses an average vehicle emission rate of 185 mg/s and a 10% factor. The report's CO criteria reference 35 ppm for one-hour exposure and 25 ppm for eight-hour exposure. The plotted B1 and B2 contours show the spatial distribution at adult height (1.7 m) at 20, 40 and 60 minutes.

Average vehicle emission rate

185 mg/s

Emission factor

10%

One-hour exposure criterion

35 ppm

Eight-hour exposure criterion

25 ppm

These are criteria referenced by the supplied report and are not independent verification of performance or compliance.

Airflow Results — Basement 1

The B1 airflow figures show velocity contours at fan height (2.5 m) and adult height (1.7 m), with reference levels of 1 m/s and 0.1 m/s. These views help identify the main flow paths created by the impulse fans and areas with lower air movement. The report notes that velocities up to 0.1 m/s are insufficient for CO extraction.

Basement 1 velocity contours at fan height
Basement 1 velocity contours at fan height

CO Results — Basement 1

The B1 CO figures present concentration contours at 1.7 m for 20, 40 and 60 minutes. They illustrate how concentrations vary by location and over the simulated period. The results should be interpreted against the report's stated exposure criteria and the original simulation output.

Basement 1 carbon monoxide concentration contours at 20 and 40 minutes
Basement 1 — carbon monoxide contours at 20 and 40 minutes

Fire and Smoke Results — Basement 1

The report uses a 4 MW passenger-car fire over a 2 m × 5 m area. The heat-release curve rises linearly to 4 MW over 300 seconds, remains constant until 900 seconds and declines to zero by 1,200 seconds. Smoke concentration and sight-length contours are presented at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 32 minutes at 1.7 m height, alongside temperature contours over the same period.

Basement 1 smoke concentration contours at 5 and 10 minutes
Basement 1 — smoke concentration at 5 and 10 minutes
Basement 1 sight-length contours at 5 and 10 minutes
Basement 1 — sight-length contours at 5 and 10 minutes
Basement 1 temperature contours at 5 and 10 minutes
Basement 1 — temperature contours at 5 and 10 minutes

Airflow and CO Results — Basement 2

The B2 airflow figures show velocity contours at fan height (2.5 m) and adult height (1.7 m), using reference levels of 1 m/s and 0.1 m/s. CO concentration plots at 1.7 m are provided for 20, 40 and 60 minutes to review pollutant distribution under the modelled ventilation arrangement.

Basement 2 velocity contours at fan height
Basement 2 — velocity contours at fan height
Basement 2 carbon monoxide concentration contours at 20 and 40 minutes
Basement 2 — carbon monoxide contours at 20 and 40 minutes

Fire and Smoke Results — Basement 2

The B2 fire simulation follows the report's 4 MW, 2 m × 5 m passenger-car fire scenario. Smoke concentration, sight length and temperature contours are presented at adult height for 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 33 minutes. The supplied report states that smoke leakage from fire zones is not considered, so that assumption should be retained when interpreting the results.

Basement 2 smoke concentration contours at 5 and 10 minutes
Basement 2 — smoke concentration at 5 and 10 minutes
Basement 2 sight-length contours at 5 and 10 minutes
Basement 2 — sight-length contours at 5 and 10 minutes
Basement 2 temperature contours at 5 and 10 minutes
Basement 2 — temperature contours at 5 and 10 minutes

Engineering Interpretation

Assessment criteria and report limitations

The report defines its own assessment criteria, including normal ventilation at 6 ACPH, emergency ventilation at 12 ACPH, CO exposure thresholds and a sight-length objective of more than 30 m to an escape point within 15 minutes after the fire is extinguished. This webpage summarises the source report and does not independently verify whether every criterion is met.

Assessment Scope

  • Normal ventilation at 6 ACPH and fire-mode ventilation at 12 ACPH.
  • CO distribution at adult height and stated exposure thresholds.
  • Smoke, sight-length and temperature contours for both basements.

Important Limitations

  • The supplied report states that smoke leakage from fire zones is not considered.
  • This webpage summarises the report and does not independently validate all results or criteria.
  • Any compliance statement should be based on the complete simulation data, project assumptions and relevant approval process.

Study Parameters

Study Parameters

The supplied report covers two basement levels, with normal and fire ventilation modes and a defined passenger-car fire scenario.

2 basement levels — B1 and B2 modelled
6 ACPH normal ventilation mode
12 ACPH fire ventilation mode
4 MW design passenger-car fire
20 GJ-AU315E impulse fans per basement

Analysis Outputs

Analysis Outputs

The report presents the following output categories for review across both basement levels.

Airflow velocity contours at 2.5 m and 1.7 m
Carbon monoxide contours at 20, 40 and 60 minutes
Smoke concentration, sight length and temperature over time

Project Deliverables

Analysis outputs covered in the case study

The following items summarise the model information and result visualisations described in the supplied report.

Three-dimensional models for B1 and B2
Impulse-fan, fresh-air and exhaust-fan layouts
Airflow velocity contours at 2.5 m and 1.7 m
CO concentration contours at 20, 40 and 60 minutes
Fire scenario and heat-release curve summary
Smoke concentration, sight-length and temperature contours
Technical summary of the report's stated criteria and assumptions

About HyperCurve Solutions

Planning a ventilation or fire study?

HyperCurve Solutions Private Limited provides engineering simulation services for fire and smoke movement, ventilation performance and building safety studies. CFD and FDS-based analysis can help project teams assess airflow patterns, contaminant distribution and smoke behaviour under defined scenarios.

Assess airflow distribution, CO levels and smoke movement using project-specific engineering simulation.